Details

Written by: Rod Boyle

Category: Ideas & Questions

Published: 18 October 2026

Hits: 28

An interesting take on the idea of mind, that a substantial portion of it lies outside of our brain. 

Link: Wikipedia on the Extended Mind Hypothesis

I regard this less as a Hypothesis than a way of reframing our ideas of mind - mind is shaped not only by our environment, is more than the sum of our own memories (think film and books), is in fact extended everywhere we can see and a great many places we cannot. 

We can store our thoughts on paper, in computers, share them around the world, words, videos, can provoke responses, themselves extending our minds, our physical place - house, apartment, furnishings, knick-knacks, all contribute to the quality of mind, all are governed, managed, we can set up our computers, AI bot agents, to furnish us with news we want (or need), we can disregard the evidence of our senses and education in favour of what our phones tell us, our memories...

And - these media allow us to extend our mind both forward and backwards through time, we can remember fondly their acquisition just as others may remember us in the inheritance of said objects, the theory implies the existence of the person beyond their mortal lives...

Details

Written by: Rod Boyle

Category: Ideas & Questions

Published: 18 October 2026

Hits: 28

This, inspired by the myth of Orpheus & Eurydice, or Lot's Wife, an analysis of the "Don't Look Back!" motif in folktales, legends and mythology.

I didn't write this, merely asked Claude AI to give me a summing up. It did well:

“Don’t Look Back” in Myth, Legend, and Folklore

In folklore studies this is often indexed as a taboo motif (Stith Thompson’s Motif-Index files “looking back” as a taboo under the C300s). It almost always appears at a threshold: leaving a doomed city, the underworld, or the otherworld.

The Tales

1. Lot’s Wife (Hebrew Bible, Genesis 19)

Angels tell Lot’s family to flee Sodom and not look back. Lot’s wife does and is turned into a pillar of salt. Jesus later invokes her in Luke 17:32 (“Remember Lot’s wife”) and says in Luke 9:62 that no one who looks back after setting a hand to the plow is fit for the kingdom.

2. Orpheus and Eurydice (Greek)

Orpheus charms Hades into releasing his dead wife on the condition that he not look back until they reach the surface. At the last moment he turns, and she vanishes back into the underworld forever.

3. Izanagi and Izanami (Japanese, Kojiki and Nihon Shoki)

Izanagi follows his dead wife Izanami into Yomi, the land of the dead. She asks him not to look at her, but he does and sees her decaying body. He flees, pursued by her furies, and seals the passage with a boulder. This is a close cousin of the motif: the taboo is “don’t look at the dead,” and the result is permanent separation of life and death.

4. Native American “Orpheus” Tales (Cherokee, Yuma, Ojibwe, Tahltan, and others)

A widower journeys to the land of the dead to retrieve his wife and is allowed to bring her back if he obeys a taboo (often not touching her, not looking, or not speaking until a set time). He breaks it, and she is lost. Scholars have long debated whether these are independent parallels or influenced by European tellings.

5. Oisín and Tír na nÓg (Irish)

Oisín returns from the Otherworld, where he has lived for what felt like three years but was three hundred, with a warning never to touch the ground. He falls from his horse, instantly ages, and loses his youth. This is a variant: the taboo is on touching the mortal world rather than looking back.

6. Forbidden-Gaze Relatives

These aren’t “looking back” strictly, but they share the logic that looking at the wrong thing at the wrong time destroys a bond:

• Cupid and Psyche (Roman): Psyche must not look at her husband’s face.
• The Crane Wife (Japanese): the husband must not look into the weaving room.
• Bluebeard (European): the wife must not open one door.
• Melusine (French): the husband must not see her on Saturdays.

7. Folk Beliefs and Customs

Many cultures advise not looking back when leaving a graveyard or funeral, when walking away from a ritual that has sent off spirits, or when someone calls your name at night on a lonely road. The assumption is that looking back invites the dead or spirits to follow you.

What It Means: Symbolic Interpretations

Attachment to the past. The most common reading is that clinging to what’s behind you prevents transformation. Lot’s wife is the classic image of nostalgia that petrifies: she literally becomes fixed in place, unable to move forward.

Obedience versus doubt. Orpheus turns because he doubts: he can’t hear Eurydice’s footsteps and fears he’s been tricked. The test is trust, in the gods, in the process, in a future you can’t yet see. Looking back is the demand for proof, and faith traditions often treat that demand as the failure itself.

Death is final. Many of these stories are about the boundary between the living and the dead being non-negotiable. The backward glance is the mourner’s refusal to accept loss, and the story enforces acceptance. They can be read as mythic models of grief: you may visit the dead in imagination, but you can’t bring them back.

Liminality and ritual. Thresholds are dangerous in ritual thinking, and the traveler must stay focused until fully through. Looking back means you are still “half in” the old state, so the transition fails, which is why the same logic shows up in funeral customs.

The destructive gaze. Some interpreters, notably the writer Maurice Blanchot reading Orpheus, see the glance as the moment when desire to possess or fully see the beloved destroys it. For Blanchot, Orpheus’s look is also the artist’s: the song can only exist by risking and losing its object. Orpheus achieves the art, not the woman.

Compassion or curiosity as transgression. Rabbinic commentary offers a more sympathetic view: Lot’s wife may have looked back out of concern for the family she was leaving behind. The tale then becomes a harsh meditation on the cost of leaving, where even a natural human impulse is treated as fatal.

Psychological reading. Jungians and others read it as the tension between ego and the unconscious: you can descend and retrieve something, but you must return to ordinary consciousness without turning back for confirmation, or the retrieved content dissolves.

Common Thread

In nearly every version, the thing you leave behind is something you shouldn’t or can’t keep: a destroyed world, a dead lover, a past self. Looking back is the moment of attachment, and the story punishes it. Different traditions disagree on whether that’s a lesson in faith, a model of grief, or a tragedy about the limits of human love.

Details

Written by: Rod Boyle

Category: Ideas & Questions

Published: 07 October 2026

Hits: 155

And, through all my occult reading I've noticed something. Ghosts, demons, cryptids, UFO's, all still variously reported. But the lowly Poltergeist, companion to the disaffected adolescent, has become virtually extinct. 

I mean, I keep up on my Forteana and it definitely seems that since the rise of cell-phones and computers the phenomenon has disappeared. 

I miss them. If you should know of any please by all means send them 'round. 

Details

Written by: Rod Boyle

Category: Ideas & Questions

Published: 07 October 2026

Hits: 137

I get the news every day, and I've a pretty good idea. 

Yes, Trump is definitely pandering to his Christian Nationalist/Zionist/White Supremacist base, but that's - for the most part - just him talking out his ass. And you can't rely on the news, as it's generally filled with distractions, like "Gulf/Lake of America" or "Tariffs" or "I'd let Iran take out Los Angelos or San Diego, it would be a small price to pay..." - all these are distractions.

Somebody else is writing the script, Trump would never have been smart enough to do it himself, but - looking at all the hype AI has been generating for itself (and - most of isn't true and ALL of it's preventable), looking beyond the Iran War and ICE and daily distractions there's something - for lack of better wording - a lot more sinister afoot.

I'd explain it but that's a long article. Instead I'll do one better and share a video that makes the most sense of the world today and where we're heading...

If it's not appearing above, use this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZpobX6MQVA

He has some well thought out opinions, and - I doubt very much this is a conspiracy theory, this is the plan. 

And now that you know...